Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 2:53:19 GMT -6
Traps (suppression of unemployment insurance, labor reform, appeal against homosexual marriage , transfer of sick people to public health), and attributing hidden intentions to his opponent. The leader of the pp got around them with some ease, even when he insisted that he was not answering him. The bottom line that rubalcaba used was that the pp's electoral program , which he handled repeatedly, even citing the pages, was ambiguous and hid dangerous intentions, about which he insisted on asking rajoy, who rarely answered, and other times he blamed the socialist. Making judgments about intentions, not knowing how to read well or not knowing what they were reading. Rubalcaba accused him that he was going to lower pensions , and rajoy responded that it was this government who had frozen them, and to the accusations about private management of health centers he responded that the socialists had done that when they governed catalonia or the balearic islands. To left-wing voters it was quite evident that rubalcaba was addressing his speech , not to the general population, but to left-wing voters , and that is why he emphasized all the aspects that interest that sector: tax on the rich, control of banks, defense of unions, public health, public education, homosexual marriage .
He dedicated too much time to very partial issues, such as the abolition of deputations or homosexual marriage. Rajoy had a more general approach, trying to analyze the substance of the problems and solutions, and outlining proposals Special Database from his program. At some point he was blunt, like when he stated “I'm not like you ”, and asked his opponent to prove what he was saying. In others, he revealed some sign of irony: when rubalcaba told him that he had given “ a first cldonkey economics cldonkey that many will appreciate ,” he responded: “you do.” eta in the debate the third section was used by rubalcaba to talk about security, and specifically to bring about the end of eta, although he was very careful to score the 'both', while rajoy addressed foreign policy in recent years to say that spain has lost weight in europe and america for dedicating themselves to the alliance of civilizations. The name of josé luis rodríguez zapatero was not even mentioned (except for a slip by rajoy, who began to call him “rodríguez rubalcaba”), and there was no talk of the 'champion case' , which affects minister josé blanco. Rajoy had decided in advance not to address this matter.
The pp candidate hardly risked anything. He moved with great care so as not to make any serious mistakes, which he did. Rubalcaba was the one with the most stake in the debate , given his situation in the polls, but, by not becoming the winner, he has missed his best opportunity to change the situation. If experts calculate that a debate of these characteristics can only modify voting intention by 1 or 1.5% , in this case possibly not even that in any direction. However, there was a certain consensus among analysts that the most positive thing about the debate was that it was held.The government is not skimping on efforts or resources to 'place' miguel ángel moratinos at the un. For his campaign to direct the fao , zapatero put at his disposal two young diplomats, a secretary and they failed . Now, as el confidencial digital has learned , the socialist leader has mobilized juan carlos gafo , current ambdonkeyador of lebanon and very close to the president – he was his director of protocol from 2004 to.